Month: September 2017

Podcasts I’m Currently Listening To

I’ve been listening to podcasts for several years now. I listen to them while I run with my Couch to 5K app going in the background. The ones that are in my current rotation are:

The Productive Woman

Laura McClellan is a real estate lawyer with several grown children who talks about productivity for professional women. I always get a few tips or gems from most episodes of this show.

Organize 365 Podcast

Lisa is a professional organizer who shares here tracks for killing clutter and organizing your home and work life. Each episode focuses on a particular issue; there are some that I skip because they are not relevant to me at this life stage, but the ones that I have listened to are quite useful and are a great place to get new ideas.

The Productivity Show

This podcast is hosted by the Asian Efficiency website and dives very deep into exploring productivity. I’ve applied several things that I’ve learned here to my working life as a professor that have saved me time and have improved my ability to get things done.

Hannah and Matt Know It All

Han and Matt do a weekly round-up of questions answered by online and newspaper advice columnists. The questions are bananas, and just when you think you’ve heard it all…a question that you can’t believe is real gets addressed. This podcast is tough talking, realistic, socially aware, and compassionate. It is also vastly entertaining.

My Favorite Murder

This podcast is hosted by two comedians who each take turns giving rundowns of true life murders. It’s fascinating, very dark, and often creepy. The hosts employ gallows humour frequently and go down rabbit holes and tangents that sometimes go on a bit too long, but it’s very entertaining and I’ve laughed out loud several times while listening.


Star Trek Discovery: Initial Impressions and Review Based on the 1st Two Episodes

WARNING: This review contains spoilers about the first two episodes of Star Trek Discovery. It also contains references to plot points from other Star Trek series.


My induction as a Trekkie occurred in Grade 7 when a TV station in my area started running the original Star Trek episodes in syndication. From the first episode I was hooked. I’m currently watching all of the Star Trek: The Next Generation episodes with my son on Netflix. I have therefore been anticipating the launch of a new Star Trek series for quite some time (12 long years) and I have very high expectations for that show given the fact that I wasn’t a huge fan of the series Enterprise.

I watched the two-hour premiere of Discovery last night and must admit to having mixed feelings about the show. I expected the show to be a bit dark in terms of story line and to exhibit “cowboy” space exploration as the show is set 10 years before the original series and space is still likely to really be a somewhat unexplored final frontier.

Many of the details were super cool and nerdy to a Trekkie like myself. These included the transporter effect, the phasers, the Starfleet uniforms (especially the number of pips on the Starfleet badges used to indicate rank), and the bridge of the Discovery. These visuals were permutations of what we’ve seen before as an audience, but with a novel spin which was interesting.

It’s clear from these episodes that the story arc will be continuous and that it will heavily include the Klingons. I’ll be honest that the Klingons as presented in this show are unfamiliar. This includes multiple changes to their physiology, language, and culture. These could all be very interesting over time, but they were rather jarring last night. While the Klingons are still presented as a warrior race, some of them appear to be content to rest on their laurels, some are religious zealots, and others are outcasts due to previous power struggles. They are also pretty sneaky which is exhibiting a distinct lack of honour in my opinion. There is a treasure trove of information to dive into here, but there does exist a danger in unravelling Star Trek cannon a little too much for my liking. My biggest beef was that my husband and I were constantly brought out of the story and show by the guttural delivery of the Klingon language which is much harsher than that spoken by Klingons from any of the other series. I’m intrigued by the fact that the Klingon forehead bridge is highly variable in the Klingons seen on the series thus far depending on their house and I suspect that this might be important as the series develops.

The other large issue for me when watching the episodes last night was that I didn’t find myself rooting for any of the characters. There were a lot of confusing dichotomies on display that seemed unrealistic. As an example, the captain of the USS Shenzhou makes several references to having a past that is filled with pain and suffering caused by conflict, but seems rather lackadaisical about the appearance of an armada of Klingon ships suddenly appearing and the implications of that event to the Federation. The science officer is exceeding cloying. The main character’s personality is all over the place; at times stoic due to her Vulcan upbringing, and later ludicrously irrational when breaking the chain of command on the ship and especially after the death of her captain. She ends up court martialled and sentenced to imprisonment at the end of the second episode and it was a bit of a struggle to frankly care about what’s going to happen to her next. As to that, I’m pretty sure it involves redemption in the form of Jason Isaac’s character offering her a second chance based on the fact that she was the only one who felt that a show of force might have changed the outcome of the first significant contact between the Federation and the Klingons. Pulling people out of jail for a unique skill set seems to be a recurring theme in a couple of Star Trek shows (Ensign Ro Laren in Next Generation and Tom Paris in Voyager being the most obvious examples).

Most Trek series have pretty rocky starts until the cast and crew start to gel and the writing and milieu of the show comes together. This show has a steeper hill to climb based on what’s come before and the fact that they are playing in a much grittier universe than previously. Hopefully they’ll be able to boldly go where no one has gone before and get the kinks ironed out in short order.


Doctor Al Digest #22

A great post over at the Conditionally Accepted blog entitled “Latinxs in Academe: Rage about “Diversity Work that effectively articulates the anger that is generated and internalized when one is assumed and expected to speak for an entire group.

This beautiful piece by Ta-Nehisi Coates is a must read. I am in awe of this man’s ability to use English prose. The lovely turns of phrase in this piece are surprising given its subject matter. I read it several weeks ago and it’s haunted me ever since.

I had previously avoided reading anything authored by Margaret Wente on purpose. Her column on Sept. 19, 2017 about students with disabilities was ignorant, unkind, and poorly researched. I won’t do it the dignity of linking to it here. I’ll warn you not to read the comments either; most of them are equally gross and lacking in empathy.


Common Problems Experienced during Graduate Student Theses and Defenses

By this point in my career, I’ve been on both sides of this scenario; I’ve written and defended 3 theses (undergraduate, M.Sc., and Ph.D.) and I’ve evaluated a number of theses and presentations from my own students and those from other labs. Here’s my 2 cents on common problems that I’ve experienced, or have heard about from others. I’m focusing on issues that can occur after the thesis has been written and submitted to the committee members up to and including the oral defense of the thesis.

Challenges for the Student

  1. Figures in the thesis aren’t as good or robust as those used in the presentation.

I’ve been in several defenses where many concepts that were challenging to figure out while reading the written thesis have been cleared up by the inclusion of additional figures in the presentation. It would be great if students just included these additional figures from the get-go as this would really improve the experience of the reader.

2. Figure and Table captions are not sufficient.

I always recommend to students that figures and tables should be able to stand on their own without any help from the written text of the thesis. This can be achieved by including an appropriate level of detail in your captions that explains what the reader is seeing as well as making any jargon and acronyms clear.

3. Interpreting questions or concerns as a personal attack.

It is very hard not to take concerns or questions about your writing, data, or presentation personally. While you should definitely not be a doormat, you should be respectful and thoughtful when receiving the feedback and opinions of your committee members.

4. Lack of knowledge on the basic theories, techniques, or information of your field.

Often committee members will ask what we see as very basic questions about your project and your field of study. If you mention something in your thesis or presentation, expect to answer questions about that content. Be sure that your focus has not narrowed so much that you neglect to explore and understand the theory or basic tenets of your research area. For example, if you are showing images of Western blots, I will likely ask you to explain the theory of how this technique works. It looks very bad if you can’t explain technique that is in your thesis.

5. Absent or inappropriate use of statistical analyses.

I’m not a statistical wizard, but even my Spidey senses start tingling when I can’t understand why you’ve chosen particular approaches, whether they are appropriate, and what they are telling you about your data.

Challenges for Examiners

  1. This is not the time to retaliate for a slight that occurred in 1999 from another faculty member on the committee.

Focus on the student’s work and accomplishments and let it go. Stop being so petty and giving professionals a bad reputation.

2. Come prepared and be on time.

Respect the time and efforts of the student and other committee members. Come with useful and insightful questions and suggestions.

3. Clearly communicate the student’s strengths and accomplishments that impressed you.

Be kind and sincere in your praise. A thesis degree is a tough slog and we don’t compliment our students enough and should celebrate their successes.

4. It isn’t about you.

Check your ego at the door. We all know that you are smart. You don’t need to convince us of this by your preambles to a question, your expositions on a particular theory, and your recently published work. Keep the focus on the student where it belongs.

What other insights can others offer about the thesis and defense experience? Leave your answer in the comments!

Doctor Al Digest #21

The Ig Nobel awards are always amusing, but they do make you think. You can go here for a list of the winners that were announced yesterday. I too have always wondered whether cats could be both a solid and a liquid.

A great post over at the blog Conditionally Accepted on Recognizing Emotional Labor in Academe

A powerful art exhibit reinforces the offensiveness and irrelevance of wondering what sexual assault survivors were wearing when they were assaulted. Trigger warning for sexual assault descriptions.


Enjoying the Successes of Colleagues

My impression is that a lot of scientists approach doing and funding science as a zero sum game. I suppose that it’s easy to get stuck in this mindset when resources are limited and as grant success percentages reach the single digits. I’ve always felt that this was an unfortunate way to go through your career and life. In recent years I’ve chosen to celebrate the success of my colleagues; I look at their success as a boon to our field of study, department, and institution. These successes also take many forms. While it is perhaps easier to see the success inherent in securing a grant, receiving a teaching award, or an honourary membership from a society or scientific body, due to the fact that they are measurable, I also think it’s important to celebrate other successes such as being a good mentor, an effective supervisor, a wonderful departmental chair, or a key contributor on a committee. Science is a hard taskmaster full of rejection and disappointments. It is well worth our time to celebrate the wins before we put our collective noses back to the grindstone. Take the time to congratulate your colleagues on their achievements; there are more than enough kind words to go around.


Impacts of Hurricane Irma on biology

The footage and news coverage of Irma has been amazing and serves to remind us that no matter how much we think that we have been able to engineer our environments we are no match for the power of Mother Nature. While much has been said about the impacts that the hurricane will have on human affairs, culture, and infrastructure, not much has been said about the long term effects that will be felt on the ecosystems in the path of the storm. This focus, when it does occur, will no doubt be on animals. My daughter was particularly disturbed by the Tweets that went out yesterday urging Floridians to not abandon their pets to fend for themselves during the hurricane. While this is certainly disturbing, it is worth taking a moment to think about the wildlife in these regions that will never be the same.

I find it amazing that birds are commonly found in the eyes of hurricanes and that they can be transplanted hundreds of kilometres by this process. Here’s a short article from the Miami Herald on the topic of wildlife and hurricanes. As a plant biologist, I’m really impressed by the ability of the palm trees to survive hurricane conditions. Here’s a quick article on the adaptations that allow them to do this.

I also found the emptying of the bays and the returning storm surge to be amazing. This phenomenon must kill a huge amount of aquatic life due to the changing water levels, salinity, temperature, and oxygen that results.